Nobody serving on the committee had any respect for the chairman.
Although this was the case, and despite all of the grumblings behind the chairman’s back, it took a long time of brooding on the subject before the rest of the committee got together and decided to take action. A vote of no confidence was held and a new chair was voted in. However, it didn’t take long to realise that the new chair was no better than the first, probably worse. A short while after this, another vote was taken and a new chair was appointed. Being well aware of the history prior to his appointment the new chair was particularly careful not to rock the boat.
Unfortunately, this didn’t work in his favour. His performance was seen as being too wishy-washy. Another vote was taken and another chair was installed. This went well for a bit until the new chair got sick and the deputy chair took over. The deputy wasn’t up to the job and it was not known how long the latest chair would be away. As a result, a new chair was voted in. The new chair also reflected on the way things had been going, but decided to take a different tack. It was decided that a greater sense of discipline was needed to run the committee. This tougher approach caused a fair bit of dissention and an urgent vote was held that saw the original chair voted back in.
With the original chair back in place, a discussion was held regarding the fact that the committee was originally formed in order to review the rules of holding committee meetings. It was generally agreed that because the work of the committee had been continually impeded by constant changes to the chair, the committee should be disbanded.
A vote was held…